| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nexus Kinnon
Genos Occidere
   |
Posted - 2009.01.03 14:02:00 -
[1]
yo put a few more points of damage onto all the large projectile ammo, finally, they're worth using.
|
Nexus Kinnon
Genos Occidere
|
Posted - 2009.01.06 01:41:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Aerin Cloudfayr
they kindof suffer from TDs where Autocannons don't so much.
lol
|
Nexus Kinnon
Genos Occidere
|
Posted - 2009.01.06 12:24:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Amarr'd
Originally by: Etho Demerzel
Omg stop complaining about discussions in a discussion forum. If you don't have anything to contribute to the thread go somewhere else.
Quoting your reply so I can reply to you about something you said in the above quote, raising meaningless points and being very serious while doing it.
shut up ched ffs
|
Nexus Kinnon
Genos Occidere
|
Posted - 2009.01.07 13:29:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Nexus Kinnon on 07/01/2009 13:29:33
Originally by: Amarr'd
Hi Nexus my fellow corp member.
no sorry CHED, I'm not stupid enough to get into a MASSIVE QUOTED SHIPS AND MODULES SERIOUS SUPER argument with goumindongs.
|
Nexus Kinnon
Genos Occidere
|
Posted - 2009.01.07 16:20:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Amarr'd
Edited by: Amarr''d on 07/01/2009 16:09:13
Originally by: Nexus Kinnon
no sorry CHED, I'm not stupid enough to get into a MASSIVE QUOTED SHIPS AND MODULES SERIOUS SUPER argument with goumindongs.
But why is exactly and/or almost 29.65% better than other posts.
heh, you cannot POSSIBLY BE THIS THICK? this will be dealt with
Originally by: Amarr'd
Originally by: Nexus Kinnon
Im nexus and I am fat.
Ok you have got me on this 1 I have to agree with your statement, but I am gonna act as if I am arguing about it because I like to.
heh, you and your DOGMAS.  it's called t1 ammo, try fitting it noob
Originally by: Amarr'd
Originally by: Nexus Kinnon
My ship is better than your ship in this exact 1 situation.
Its not because I am gonna post some setup that does exactly what yours does but 1.7% better and prove you wrong but then your gonna post 1 back untill we have the most uber 1337 sniper battleship from 145.7km using only t1 ammo and making sure that it has exactly 83k ehp. This will be dealt with. My fit is the following.
HIGH
06 x Cruise Missile Launcher I
01 x SMALL TRACTOR BEAM 1
01 x SALVAGER I
MEDIUM
04 x LARGE SHIELD EXTENDERS
01 x 'HYPHNOS' ECM
01 x MEDIUM SHIELD BOOSTER
LOW
01 x EMERGENCY DAMAGE CONTROL
01 x ARMOR KINETIC HARDENER I
01 x ARMOR THREMIC HARDENER I
02 x WARP CORE STABILIZER I
DRONES
02 x WARRIOR I DRONES
03 x HAMMERHEAD I DRONES
UPGRADES
01 x ROCKET FUEL CACHE PARTINTION I
01 x BAY LOADING ACCELERATOR I
oh so now you're just backpedalling, pfft, lame. i think you'll find that my argument is MORE CONSQUENTIAL than yours
Originally by: Amarr'd
Originally by: Nexus Kinnon
well at least my dong is bigger than yours
i like ****s
YEAH I KNOW YOU DO LOL
|
Nexus Kinnon
Genos Occidere
|
Posted - 2009.01.07 16:21:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Nexus Kinnon on 07/01/2009 16:21:40
oh btw i think you'll find that according to my data that I just made up you are gay
EDIT
EFT BACKS UP MY CONCLUSIONS |
Nexus Kinnon
Genos Occidere
|
Posted - 2009.01.08 12:44:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Gal Ore
If projectiles suck, then why are projectile ships so wildly successful?
WILDLY SUCCESSFUL
example:
rupture |
Nexus Kinnon
Genos Occidere
|
Posted - 2009.01.08 19:19:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Naomi Knight
Edited by: Naomi Knight on 08/01/2009 19:16:19
Why are artys and autocannons broken? Just explain this to me pls.
LARGE artys and autocannons are simply not up to scratch in the damage and range stakes when compared to other large weapons systems.
|
| |
|